http://electronicportfolios.com/portfolios/EPDevProcess.html
Electronic Portfolios = Multimedia Development + Portfolio Development
The Electronic Portfolio Development Process
© 1999,2000, Helen C. Barrett, Ph.D.
The process of developing electronic teaching portfolios can document
evidence of teacher competencies and guide long-term professional development.
The competencies may be locally defined, or linked to national teaching
standards. Two primary assumptions in this process are: 1.) a portfolio
is not a haphazard collection of artifacts (i.e., a scrapbook) but rather
a reflective tool which demonstrates growth over time; and 2.) as we move
to more standards-based teacher performance assessment, we need new tools
to record and organize evidence of successful teaching, for both practicing
professionals and student teachers.
One of the most exciting developments in the school reform movement
is the use of alternative forms of assessment to evaluate student learning,
and one of the most popular forms of authentic assessment is the use of
portfolios. The point of the portfolio (electronic or paper) is to provide
a "richer picture" of a student's abilities, and to show growth over time.
Portfolios are being developed at all phases of the life span, beginning
in early childhood, through K-12 and higher education, to professional
teaching portfolios. As more schools expand student access to technology,
there are an increasing number of options available for developing electronic
student portfolios, including relational databases, hypermedia programs,
WWW pages, PDF files, and commercial proprietary programs like Grady Profile,
SuperSchool's Electronic Portfolio and Persona Plus.
Electronic portfolio development draws on two bodies of literature:
multimedia development (decide, design, develop, evaluate) (Ivers &
Barron, 1998) and portfolio development (collection, selection, reflection,
projection) (Danielson & Abrutyn, 1997). Both processes are complimentary
and essential for effective electronic portfolio development. Understanding
how these two processes fit together, along with understanding the role
of standards in electronic portfolio development, will provide teachers
and students with a powerful tool for demonstrating growth over time
which is the primary value of a portfolio.
Benefits of Electronic Portfolio Development
Based on research into the implementation of electronic portfolios for
both students and teachers since 1991, the following benefits appear to
result from developing electronic portfolios with teachers and students:
1. Creating an electronic portfolio can develop teachers' as well as
students' multimedia development skills. The multimedia development process
usually covers the following stages:
- Decide/Assess - determining needs, goals, audience for the presentation
- Design/Plan - determining content, sequence of the presentation
- Develop - Gather and organize multimedia materials to include in the presentation
- Implement - Give the presentation
- Evaluate - Evaluate the presentation's effectiveness
2. Modeling: If teachers develop electronic teaching portfolios, their
students will be more likely to have their own electronic portfolios
3. Each stage of the portfolio development process contributes to teachers'
professional development and students' lifelong learning:
- Collection - teachers and students learn to save artifacts that represent the successes (and "growth opportunities") in their day-to-day teaching and learning
- Selection - teachers and students review and evaluate the artifacts they have saved, and identify those that demonstrate achievement of specific standards (this is where most electronic portfolios stop)
- Reflection - teachers and students become reflective practitioners, evaluating their own growth over time and their achievement of the standards, as well as the gaps in their development
- Projection - teachers and students compare their reflections to the standards and performance indicators, and set learning goals for the future. This is the stage that turns portfolio development into professional development and supports lifelong learning.
- Presentation - teachers and students share their portfolios with their peers. This is the stage where appropriate "public" commitments can be made to encourage collaboration and commitment to professional development and lifelong learning.
Understanding how these two processes fit together, along with how standards
fit into electronic portfolio development, will allow teachers and students
to gain the most benefit in demonstrating the results of student learning
over time, which should be the primary purpose for creating a portfolio.
At the reflection stage, portfolio developers articulate their thinking about each piece in their portfolio. Through this process of reflection, we become increasingly aware of ourselves as learners. For the novice or young learner, it may be appropriate to use reflective prompts, or open-ended questions to guide the reflections. It is recommended to include reflections on every piece plus an overall reflection on the entire portfolio. In the projection or direction stage, the portfolio developers, review their reflections on their learning, taking the opportunity to look ahead and set goals for the future. At this stage, portfolio developers should see patterns in their work and use these observations to help identify goals for future learning. It is at this stage that the portfolio becomes a powerful tool for long term development. I have added the connection stage to the ASCD model, since this can become a powerful motivator for long-term development. In this stage, the portfolio is presented to the appropriate audience and discussed in meaningful conversation about teaching and/or learning. (This stage may occur before or after the projection stage.) Often, appropriate "public" commitments to learning goals can encourage collaboration and commitment to professional development and lifelong learning. Also, the feedback received in this stage can lead to further goal-setting. Robin Fogarty, Kay Burke, and Susan Belgrad (1994, 1996) have identified ten options for portfolio development, further defining the stages and increasing the quality of the portfolio process:
|
The multimedia development process usually covers the following stages: Assess/Decide, Plan/Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate. Decide/Assess: In the first stage, in the case of a multimedia presentation, the focus is on a needs assessment of the potential audience, the presentation goals, and the tools that may be most appropriate for the presentation context. When developing an electronic portfolio, the focus is on the audience for the portfolio, the learner goals that the portfolio should be demonstrating. These goals should follow from national, state, or local standards and their associated evaluation rubrics or performance indicators. This stage in the portfolio development process should identify and describe the assessment context. Design/Plan: In the second stage of multimedia development, the focus is on organizing or designing the presentation. The focus is on determining audience-appropriate content and presentation sequence, constructing flowcharts, writing storyboards. This is also the time to determine audience-appropriate software, storage and presentation medium. When developing an electronic portfolio, the focus is also on describing the audience(s) for the portfolio, whether they be the student, parent, college, community, or any other stakeholder in the assessment process. Now is the time to determine content of portfolio items (by context) and the type of evidence to be collected; determine which software tools are most appropriate for the portfolio context; and determine which storage and presentation medium is most appropriate for the situation Develop: In this third stage of multimedia development, the focus is on gathering multimedia materials to include in the presentation, organizing the materials into a sequence (or with hypermedia links) for the best presentation of the material, using an appropriate multimedia authoring program. When developing an electronic portfolio, the focus is on gathering multimedia materials that represent a learnerís achievement and including those artifacts in the portfolio. This is where the artifacts can be linked to standards, preferably in a relational database. In electronic portfolio development, students also record their self-reflections on their own work and achievement of the goals/standards. Teachers record feedback on student work and achievement of goals/standards. The final part of this stage is to organize the material using hypertext links between goals/standards, student work samples, rubrics and assessments. Implement: In this fourth stage of multimedia development, the developer gives the presentation. In electronic portfolio development, the portfolio is recorded to appropriate presentation and storage medium. The electronic portfolio is also presented to an appropriate audience, by the student in age-appropriate situations. Evaluate: In this final stage of multimedia development, the focus is on evaluating the presentationís effectiveness. In electronic portfolio development, we not only evaluate the portfolioís effectivenes in light of its purpose and the assessment context; we also use the portfolio evidence to make instruction/learning decisions. In some cases, we may collect exemplary portfolio artifacts for comparison purposes. There are two types of evaluation: Formative Evaluation, which usually occurs on an ongoing basis, and Summative Evaluation, which usually occurs when the project is completed. |
From the discussion of both the Multimedia Development Process and the Portfolio Development Process, along with the discussion of the appropriate technology tools, five stages of Electronic Portfolio Development emerge. Here are the issues to address at each stage of this process. |
Portfolio Development | Electronic Portfolio Development | Multimedia Development |
Purpose & Audience | 1. Defining the Portfolio Context & Goals | Decide
Assess |
Collect
Interject |
2. The Working Portfolio | Design
Plan |
Select
Reflect Direct |
3. The Reflective Portfolio | Develop |
Inspect
Perfect Connect |
4. The Connected Portfolio | Implement
Evaluate |
Respect | 5. The Presentation Portfolio | Present
Publish |
Differentiating the levels of Electronic Portfolio Implementation In addition to the stages of portfolio development, there appear to be at least five levels of electronic portfolio development. In reviewing the electronic portfolios that are produced, it is important to establish different expectation levels for development. Just as there are developmental levels in student learning, there are developmental levels in digital portfolio development. Below different levels for digital multimedia development and electronic portfolio development, which are closely aligned with the technology skills of the student or teacher portfolio developer. |
All documents are in paper format. Some portfolio data may be stored on video tape. | All documents are in digital file formats, using word processing or other commonly-used software, and stored in electronic folders on a hard drive, floppy diskette or LAN server. | Portfolio data is entered
into a structured format, such as a database or HyperStudio template
or slide show (PowerPoint or AppleWorks) and stored on a hard drive, Zip, floppy diskette or LAN server. |
Documents are translated
into Portable Document Format with "hyper-links" between standards, artifacts,
and reflections using Adobe Acrobat Exchange and stored on a hard drive,
Zip, Jaz,
CD-R/W, or LAN server. |
Documents are translated into HTML, complete with "hyper-links" between standards, artifacts, and reflections, using a web authoring program and posted to a WWW server. | Portfolio is organized with a multimedia authoring program, incorporating digital sound and video is converted to digital format and pressed to CD-R/W or posted to WWW in streaming format. |
Multimedia Development: Decide/Assess
Portfolio Development: Purpose & Audience
You will know you are ready for the next stage when:
You have selected the development software you will be using and have completed the first stage using that tool. |
Multimedia Development: Design/Plan
Portfolio Development: Collect
Select software tools to organize selected artifacts:
Use a video camera, digitizing hardware and software to digitize video artifacts [Level 5] You will know you are ready for the next stage when:
|
Multimedia Development: Develop
Portfolio Development: Select, Reflect, Direct Record self-reflection on work and achievement of goals. The quality of the learning that results from the portfolio development process will be in direct proportion to the quality of the self-reflection on the work. One challenge in this process will be the need for confidentiality of these reflections. This is the place where the personal, private reflections of the learner need to be guarded, and not published in a public medium. Record feedback on work and achievement of goals. Even more critical is the confidential nature of the assessment process. Feedback should also be kept confidential so that only the student, parents and other appropriate audiences have access, and not published in a public medium.
OR OR |
portfolio development into powerful professional development |
You will know you are ready for the next stage when:
- You have selected the artifacts that are going into your formal or presentation portfolio.
You have written the reflective statements and identified learning goals for the future.
Multimedia Development: Implement, Evaluate Portfolio Development: Inspect, Perfect,Connect
or HTML [Level 4] AND OR You will know you are ready for the next stage when:
|
Multimedia Development: Present, Publish
Portfolio Development: Respect (Celebrate)
OR OR |
In reviewing the electronic portfolios that are produced, it is important to establish different expectation levels for development. Below are a set of rubrics that address different criteria for effective electronic portfolio development, which are closely aligned with the technology skills of the student or teacher portfolio developer. |
Little or no reflection or
mention of standards or goals.
A collection of artifacts - A scrapbook or multimedia presentation |
Simple overall reflection on the portfolio as a whole. | Level 1 PLUS Standards or portfolio goals are included. | Level 2 PLUS Reflections on achieving each standard or goal PLUS future directions (learning goals). | Level 3 PLUS Reflections on the role of each artifact in the portfolio. | Level 4 PLUS Feedback from portfolio conferencing and responses from others. Includes self-evaluation of the portfolio. |
Simple, linear presentation document. No navigation links (or may have "broken" links) | Hyperlinks (i.e., buttons) from table of contents (TOC) to standards May have links to artifacts. | Hypertext links between TOC, standards, artifacts, reflections. | Fully hyper-linked document between TOC standards, artifacts, reflections. | Interactive presentation with animation and intuitive navigation. |
No user choice in navigation. | Minimal user choice in navigation. | Appropriate and clear user choice in navigation. | Maximum and obvious user choice in navigation. | Maximum and obvious user choice in navigation. |
Documents in original, separate files | Documents may be in separate files or merged into a single file. | Documents are consolidated into a single file (PDF). | Documents are in a single directory on a web site. | Integrated, engaging, self-running multimedia presentation. |
No audio/video, or inappropriate use, distracting from content of portfolio | Audio may be included. | Appropriate audio and/or video optional. | Appropriate audio and/or video included. | Appropriate audio and video integrated seamlessly into presentation. |
Descriptors
|
|
|
|
|
There are many other criteria that could be used to evaluate electronic portfolios. Most of them should be created by the portfolio developers. One excellent reference for evaluating professional portfolios can be found in Capturing the Wisdom of Practice by Giselle O. Martin-Kniep, published by ASCD (1999). The Appendix of this book contains several rubrics for different types of professional portfolios, on a variety of dimensions at the following levels: exemplary, developed, emerging, undeveloped.
No comments:
Post a Comment